Google self-censoring itself in China is big news, I think. I was a bit surprised they've gone in for it, given the whole "don't be evil" thing but there you go.
Yes, I read the thing in LRB - John Lanchester is a good writer. Interesting to see someone think critically about the wider implications of Google, instead of the usual plaudits and chat about how amazing it is. Disappointed with the China censorship, particularly after they rebuffed the spying US government the other week. But as Colin says, corporations are compelled to adhere to the bottom-line, however brutal that makes them.
Some good points from Seamus. Google isn't really doing anything different from any other company that's going over there, but they seem to be getting much more flak for it. As for our ads, I was actually going to say the same thing: all of them are for blog software etc. Would be nice to get some more interesting adverts - I'm bored of just clicking onto sites about blogs, however much it's earning us.
On the LRB thing, there's a follow-up letter from John Lanchester in this week's issue, in which he says much what we've just said, ie: we shouldn't be surprised by Google putting profits before ethics since they are, after all, a commercial company.
I suppose the action of Google is a reflection on consumers in the Western world. We could all boycott those firms of whose activities we purport to disapprove. However by and large we don't. (I always try and buy Maxwell House though).
Re the Google ads - as I understand it their subject matter is linked to what's being written about in the blog. Didn't we get a spate of boxing related ads a couple of months back? I suspect that the typical brevity of our headline posts doesn't give google's algorithms enough of a theme to pick up on and therefore we get ads on the theme of blogging in general. Having said all this I'll try and have a check through on how it all works this weekend if I get time.
8 comments:
Google self-censoring itself in China is big news, I think. I was a bit surprised they've gone in for it, given the whole "don't be evil" thing but there you go.
They're a plc (or whatever the US equivalent is) - their duty is now to their shareholders' profits.
Yes, I read the thing in LRB - John Lanchester is a good writer. Interesting to see someone think critically about the wider implications of Google, instead of the usual plaudits and chat about how amazing it is. Disappointed with the China censorship, particularly after they rebuffed the spying US government the other week. But as Colin says, corporations are compelled to adhere to the bottom-line, however brutal that makes them.
Some good points from Seamus. Google isn't really doing anything different from any other company that's going over there, but they seem to be getting much more flak for it. As for our ads, I was actually going to say the same thing: all of them are for blog software etc. Would be nice to get some more interesting adverts - I'm bored of just clicking onto sites about blogs, however much it's earning us.
On the LRB thing, there's a follow-up letter from John Lanchester in this week's issue, in which he says much what we've just said, ie: we shouldn't be surprised by Google putting profits before ethics since they are, after all, a commercial company.
I suppose the action of Google is a reflection on consumers in the Western world. We could all boycott those firms of whose activities we purport to disapprove. However by and large we don't. (I always try and buy Maxwell House though).
Re the Google ads - as I understand it their subject matter is linked to what's being written about in the blog. Didn't we get a spate of boxing related ads a couple of months back? I suspect that the typical brevity of our headline posts doesn't give google's algorithms enough of a theme to pick up on and therefore we get ads on the theme of blogging in general. Having said all this I'll try and have a check through on how it all works this weekend if I get time.
um, can't do adds on the RHS without going to a different template, could do them at the top of the page tho' will maybe do this this weekend.
Correction, above post should have read
um, can't do adds on the LHS without going to a different template, could do them at the top of the page tho' will maybe do this this weekend.
[my emphasis]
John Lanchester's LRB update can be read here.
Post a Comment